Artel?
Artel?
Hi all -
this object has some remarkable marks but an unknown maker AX from Moscow. The mark F/3 you only find on objects from the 15th Artel - also the marking modus is the same. The quality is typical for the 15th Artel.
Here an example from my collection to compare:
See the exact marking - exept the differen maker?
Is it a work of the 15th Artel but marked/sold by AX? Did the Artels sell to vendors?
I am a little confused - I never have seen objects made by Artels sold by others - but there is alway an exeption in Russia....
Source: PL p. 209, Private collection Zolotnik
Regards
Zolotnik
this object has some remarkable marks but an unknown maker AX from Moscow. The mark F/3 you only find on objects from the 15th Artel - also the marking modus is the same. The quality is typical for the 15th Artel.
Here an example from my collection to compare:
See the exact marking - exept the differen maker?
Is it a work of the 15th Artel but marked/sold by AX? Did the Artels sell to vendors?
I am a little confused - I never have seen objects made by Artels sold by others - but there is alway an exeption in Russia....
Source: PL p. 209, Private collection Zolotnik
Regards
Zolotnik
Re: Artel?
Hi Zolotnik,
Just from practical point of view, such a mark must surely have been struck pre-assembly of the item, else the risk of shattering the glass would be very high.
In England it was common for silversmiths to hold the punches of other silversmiths. A London silversmith, for instance, if requiring certain items and knowing that a reputable Sheffield firm could produce them cheaper than they could, would order the items and supply a maker's mark punch, and the Sheffield firm would register the mark with the Sheffield Assay Office, make the items, get them assayed and hallmarked and then send them to the London firm ready to go on sale. As far as the retail customer was concerned, the work was that of the London firm.
Could it be that the 15th Artel were commissioned to make the item for AX?
Trev.
Just from practical point of view, such a mark must surely have been struck pre-assembly of the item, else the risk of shattering the glass would be very high.
In England it was common for silversmiths to hold the punches of other silversmiths. A London silversmith, for instance, if requiring certain items and knowing that a reputable Sheffield firm could produce them cheaper than they could, would order the items and supply a maker's mark punch, and the Sheffield firm would register the mark with the Sheffield Assay Office, make the items, get them assayed and hallmarked and then send them to the London firm ready to go on sale. As far as the retail customer was concerned, the work was that of the London firm.
Could it be that the 15th Artel were commissioned to make the item for AX?
Trev.
Re: Artel?
Hi Trev -
But there is always a first time....fits perfect for the 1000st contribution.
Regards
Zolotnik
That is the question. In all the years inspecting countless objects from the different Artels (authentic of course) I never have seen marks of other firms involved.dognose wrote:Could it be that the 15th Artel were commissioned to make the item for AX?
But there is always a first time....fits perfect for the 1000st contribution.
Regards
Zolotnik
Re: Artel?
Hi Zolotnik,
The 15th Artel used a peculiar F/3 mark or secondary mark, why? Could it be a mark to indicate a certain department within the 15th Artel and if so could we expect to find other F/? marks. Have other Artels used those secondary marks?
Oel.
The 15th Artel used a peculiar F/3 mark or secondary mark, why? Could it be a mark to indicate a certain department within the 15th Artel and if so could we expect to find other F/? marks. Have other Artels used those secondary marks?
Oel.
Re: Artel?
Hi oel -
Maybe Dad has an explanation?
Regards
Zolotnik
I do not know, the 15th Artel is the only Artel using this mark. The reason for this mark is completely unclear to me - since several years I try to interpret this mark. All my collector friends have also no answers.oel wrote:The 15th Artel used a peculiar F/3 mark or secondary mark, why?
Maybe Dad has an explanation?
Regards
Zolotnik
Re: Artel?
The picture was upside down — it`s actually F/S.
It seems whenever there is F/S it`s crystal glass and silver made by 15th artel.
Possibly a retailer.But Ф.С. Осиповь is in Cyrillic.
Another possibility from a Russian forum;
(In short marked for export).Крайнее справа,это F/S обозначение 15 артели. Это иностранный поставщик 15 артели, обычная практика того времени.
That`s what they think.
Re: Artel?
Hi AG2012 -
that´s what I like on experts - they have answers! Many thanks for the valuable informations - and the correction. That makes sense - I only saw this F/S (!) on the combination silver/crystal glass, never on silver!
Regards
Zolotnik
that´s what I like on experts - they have answers! Many thanks for the valuable informations - and the correction. That makes sense - I only saw this F/S (!) on the combination silver/crystal glass, never on silver!
Regards
Zolotnik
Re: Artel?
@Ag2012
I must be stupid but do you mean that F/S would be an abbreviation of the the English "Foreign Supplier"???? An abbreviation "F/S" being English on an imperial Russian object...? come on now!
I must be stupid but do you mean that F/S would be an abbreviation of the the English "Foreign Supplier"???? An abbreviation "F/S" being English on an imperial Russian object...? come on now!
Re: Artel?
HI -
Крайнее справа,это F/S обозначение 15 артели. Это иностранный поставщик 15 артели, обычная практика того времени.
As written by AG2012 is this an information from a Russian forum, stating that it was common practice to mark exported objects of the 15th Artel (crystal / glass) with F/S. This would explain plausible the Latin letters on a Russian object. I believe that Russian collectors know much more than any member on this forum!
Was this mark punched in Russia or in some border town to Europe? Where was the main entrance door (town) for exports from Russia? Marked the 15th Artel this objects themselves? A lot of interesting unanswered questions for the collector....
The insinuation that F/S is an abreviation for "Foreign Suplier" is funny but neither proven nor mentioned by AG2012 - just your version to interprete it.
We all knew that the important firms like Klingert, Gratschew, Sazikov etc. exported their merchandise to Europe and the USA with great success. Do you know how this goods were marked? Have you ever seen original pieces delivered abroad? There were strict import rules in all this countries - the reason why Fabergé opened a branche in London - only reason to make export easier.
For me is this cognizance perfectly acceptable - until someone comes up with a better explanation.
Regards
Zolotnik
Крайнее справа,это F/S обозначение 15 артели. Это иностранный поставщик 15 артели, обычная практика того времени.
As written by AG2012 is this an information from a Russian forum, stating that it was common practice to mark exported objects of the 15th Artel (crystal / glass) with F/S. This would explain plausible the Latin letters on a Russian object. I believe that Russian collectors know much more than any member on this forum!
Was this mark punched in Russia or in some border town to Europe? Where was the main entrance door (town) for exports from Russia? Marked the 15th Artel this objects themselves? A lot of interesting unanswered questions for the collector....
The insinuation that F/S is an abreviation for "Foreign Suplier" is funny but neither proven nor mentioned by AG2012 - just your version to interprete it.
We all knew that the important firms like Klingert, Gratschew, Sazikov etc. exported their merchandise to Europe and the USA with great success. Do you know how this goods were marked? Have you ever seen original pieces delivered abroad? There were strict import rules in all this countries - the reason why Fabergé opened a branche in London - only reason to make export easier.
For me is this cognizance perfectly acceptable - until someone comes up with a better explanation.
Regards
Zolotnik
Re: Artel?
How could it be struck on the border? The chances of breaking the glass would be very high. As I mentioned in my earlier post, these marks must have struck pre-assembly.Was this mark punched in Russia or in some border town to Europe?
Trev.
Re: Artel?
Not my version at all. The Russian text " иностранный поставщик " says it. I am still very doubtful about this F/S meaning...plausible but...?
And by the way, A kind of an "export mark" is the crossed kokoshink.
And by the way, A kind of an "export mark" is the crossed kokoshink.
Re: Artel?
Hi Trev -
I understand your argument very good - but did we know something abot how this things get handeled? Who made the crystal? Russian firm? I have my doubts - never heared of Russian cristal manufactures of the better range. Porcellan yes - but cristal? Maybe the parts were delivered separately, silver from Russia, cristal from X and the final assembly was done somewhere else? For example the Karelian birch/cloisonné spoons. The wooden spoons were made by some peasant families, the enamel tubes in a certain factory and some other branch assembled them. Marking before assembling, otherwise the wood have cracked.
Just some thoughts....
Regards
Zolotnik
I understand your argument very good - but did we know something abot how this things get handeled? Who made the crystal? Russian firm? I have my doubts - never heared of Russian cristal manufactures of the better range. Porcellan yes - but cristal? Maybe the parts were delivered separately, silver from Russia, cristal from X and the final assembly was done somewhere else? For example the Karelian birch/cloisonné spoons. The wooden spoons were made by some peasant families, the enamel tubes in a certain factory and some other branch assembled them. Marking before assembling, otherwise the wood have cracked.
Just some thoughts....
Regards
Zolotnik
Re: Artel?
Hi Zolotnik,
See: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: ... C09487.JPG
and: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Categ ... _of_Russia
Trev.
See: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: ... C09487.JPG
and: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Categ ... _of_Russia
Trev.
Re: Artel?
Hi Trev -
thank you for the tutoring session!
Regards
Zolotnik
thank you for the tutoring session!
Regards
Zolotnik
Re: Artel?
Hi.
Unfortunately, I don't know that there is F/S. ((
But by rules 1908 the maker mark has to be between mark of fineness and guarantee mark (kokoshnik). In this case.
Therefore, maker is AH
Unfortunately, I don't know that there is F/S. ((
But by rules 1908 the maker mark has to be between mark of fineness and guarantee mark (kokoshnik). In this case.
Therefore, maker is AH
Re: Artel?
The source mentioning crystal supplies by Maltzov Glassworks to Moscow 15th artel.
Мальцовъ. Мальцовский хрусталь
http://ruscrystal.ru/rus/article/&id=139
F/S remains unclear; if strictly meant for export one cannot assume that so many silver mounted crystal objects by 15th artel were imported back to Russia and emerged in Russian market again with original boxes with Cyrillic lettering.
All said, F/S (which appears only with 15th artel and only on crystal mountings) may be a mark used exclusively for internal use.
Мальцовъ. Мальцовский хрусталь
http://ruscrystal.ru/rus/article/&id=139
``The main customers who made silver mountings were famous Russian jewelers Bolin, Faberge, Khlebnikov, Grachev, Lorie, 4,5,13,15 artels etc.Основными исполнителями хрусталя под серебряные оправы (заказчиками были знаменитые ювелирные фирмы оссии : Болин, Фаберже, Хлебников, Грачевы, Лорие , 4,5,13,15 артели и т. д. ).
F/S remains unclear; if strictly meant for export one cannot assume that so many silver mounted crystal objects by 15th artel were imported back to Russia and emerged in Russian market again with original boxes with Cyrillic lettering.
All said, F/S (which appears only with 15th artel and only on crystal mountings) may be a mark used exclusively for internal use.
Re: Artel?
Hi AG2012 -
thanks again for your informations!
Regards
Zolotnik
thanks again for your informations!
Regards
Zolotnik