William Fearn--Or Maybe Not?
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:18 pm
Hi,
This is an report taken from 'The Gentleman's Magazine' concerning a fire that occured on Friday, 28th June 1822.
A fire broke out in the house of Mr. Fearn, jeweller and silversmith, at the corner of Adam-street, in the Strand, which, in the course of less than two hours, destroyed the whole of the premises, together with the rich and costly stock in the shop. A great quantity of plate, jewellery, and watches, have been swallowed up in the general destruction, and with them a vast number of pearls, diamonds, and precious gems of every description, together with an infinite variety of snuff-boxes, gold chains, and other things of great value. The stock on the premises was estimated at ten thousand pounds, and Mr. Fearn was only insured for six thousand of that sum.
This fire, I presume, was at the retail premises of William Fearn, although I cannot find any reference to this address.
Since 1790 William Fearn had, when entering marks at Goldsmiths Hall, used the address of 1, Lovell's Court, Paternoster Row. Period drawings of 1, Lovell's Court, show it as a three storey building with no windows on the front of the ground floor, situated in what can only be described as an alleyway. Certainly not a retail premises by any stretch of the imagination, so no surprise that he might have had retail premises located in the more fashionable west end of the city.
This is of course presuming that we are talking about William Fearn, the description 'Mr Fearn' in the report, without a forename, infers a well known character as William Fearn must have been. I know of no other Fearn involved in the trade at this time and William Fearn had no children. But in 1822 William Fearn would have been as Arthur Grimwade suggests about seventy-four, other sources even stating as old as eighty-five. Grimwade also noted that his signature in the entry at Goldsmiths Hall in 1814 was already shaky. He was however still to make a further entry in 1824, confirming his partnership with William Eley II.
It would be good to hear the views of others as to whether William Fearn is the subject of this report.
Trev.
Source: The Gentleman's Magazine
Published by F. Jefferies, 1822
.
This is an report taken from 'The Gentleman's Magazine' concerning a fire that occured on Friday, 28th June 1822.
A fire broke out in the house of Mr. Fearn, jeweller and silversmith, at the corner of Adam-street, in the Strand, which, in the course of less than two hours, destroyed the whole of the premises, together with the rich and costly stock in the shop. A great quantity of plate, jewellery, and watches, have been swallowed up in the general destruction, and with them a vast number of pearls, diamonds, and precious gems of every description, together with an infinite variety of snuff-boxes, gold chains, and other things of great value. The stock on the premises was estimated at ten thousand pounds, and Mr. Fearn was only insured for six thousand of that sum.
This fire, I presume, was at the retail premises of William Fearn, although I cannot find any reference to this address.
Since 1790 William Fearn had, when entering marks at Goldsmiths Hall, used the address of 1, Lovell's Court, Paternoster Row. Period drawings of 1, Lovell's Court, show it as a three storey building with no windows on the front of the ground floor, situated in what can only be described as an alleyway. Certainly not a retail premises by any stretch of the imagination, so no surprise that he might have had retail premises located in the more fashionable west end of the city.
This is of course presuming that we are talking about William Fearn, the description 'Mr Fearn' in the report, without a forename, infers a well known character as William Fearn must have been. I know of no other Fearn involved in the trade at this time and William Fearn had no children. But in 1822 William Fearn would have been as Arthur Grimwade suggests about seventy-four, other sources even stating as old as eighty-five. Grimwade also noted that his signature in the entry at Goldsmiths Hall in 1814 was already shaky. He was however still to make a further entry in 1824, confirming his partnership with William Eley II.
It would be good to hear the views of others as to whether William Fearn is the subject of this report.
Trev.
Source: The Gentleman's Magazine
Published by F. Jefferies, 1822
.