The enamel work looks grate to me, but tne mark look suspicious(maybe i am wrong?).
Original or fake?
Got only this photos,
Thanks.
Russian enamel 88 kovsh.
Russian enamel 88 kovsh.
Hello forum.
The enamel work looks grate to me, but tne mark look suspicious(maybe i am wrong?).
Original or fake?
Got only this photos,
Thanks.
The enamel work looks grate to me, but tne mark look suspicious(maybe i am wrong?).
Original or fake?
Got only this photos,
Thanks.
Re: Russian enamel 88 kovsh.
In my opinion you are not wrong!
Re: Russian enamel 88 kovsh.
And assayer I.Lebedkin(from Moscow) but the maker Ф.Р.(Руч Федор according to Postnikova) from Petersburg?
I think that this is the wrong combination of marks...
I think that this is the wrong combination of marks...
Re: Russian enamel 88 kovsh.
Hi RedMask -
unfortunately a "Mumbay" fake from India. The coloured glass cabochons are typical, the enamelwork is a poor copy!
By the way: the handle underside should also be marked (red arrow)!
Compare with authentic kovsh from 6th Artel in Moscow:
Regards
Goldstein
unfortunately a "Mumbay" fake from India. The coloured glass cabochons are typical, the enamelwork is a poor copy!
By the way: the handle underside should also be marked (red arrow)!
Compare with authentic kovsh from 6th Artel in Moscow:
Regards
Goldstein
Re: Russian enamel 88 kovsh.
@Goldstein
There are some kind of marks close to the body on the underside of the handle on picture number 3. Anyway, it doesn't change anything. The kovsh is still a dubious object.
@RedMask
Have you had the "stones" checked? Are they colored glass as assumed or what? Actually rather stupid if they are glass. Who puts glass on a genuine object. The answer is: A faker/cheater in order to get more profit from buyers not knowing what they are buying.
The old rule, repeated here many times, is valid again: If you don't know what you are buying ,don't buy! If one still byes, the result is obvious: The money is lost forever!
There are some kind of marks close to the body on the underside of the handle on picture number 3. Anyway, it doesn't change anything. The kovsh is still a dubious object.
@RedMask
Have you had the "stones" checked? Are they colored glass as assumed or what? Actually rather stupid if they are glass. Who puts glass on a genuine object. The answer is: A faker/cheater in order to get more profit from buyers not knowing what they are buying.
The old rule, repeated here many times, is valid again: If you don't know what you are buying ,don't buy! If one still byes, the result is obvious: The money is lost forever!
Re: Russian enamel 88 kovsh.
Sorry, the marks are actually on picture 4