I appreciate this is drifting a little off the topic of marks now, but this has piqued my curiosity... I was wondering, does anybody know what kind of base metal would have been used for a teapot by Elkington in the 1850s? Would it have been copper? Or an alloy like copper/nickel?
And also, given ...
Search found 4 matches
- Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:49 pm
- Forum: Silver Plate Trademarks - Single Image
- Topic: E&Co, no city, two years
- Replies: 4
- Views: 17470
- Wed Jan 29, 2025 6:02 pm
- Forum: Silver Plate Trademarks - Single Image
- Topic: E&Co, no city, two years
- Replies: 4
- Views: 17470
Re: E&Co, no city, two years
Haha and as I posted that I suddenly realised - it's just a repetition of E, M & Co isn't it.ajf wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2025 6:01 pm Thank you very much @dognose for the analysis.
Is there any meaning to the E and M marks?
- Wed Jan 29, 2025 6:01 pm
- Forum: Silver Plate Trademarks - Single Image
- Topic: E&Co, no city, two years
- Replies: 4
- Views: 17470
Re: E&Co, no city, two years
Thank you very much @dognose for the analysis.
Is there any meaning to the E and M marks?
Is there any meaning to the E and M marks?
- Wed Jan 29, 2025 4:21 pm
- Forum: Silver Plate Trademarks - Single Image
- Topic: E&Co, no city, two years
- Replies: 4
- Views: 17470
E&Co, no city, two years
Hello,
I'm new to this so apologies if this is basic stuff. But we have a family heirloom silver teapot, very intricate and engraved in honour of a wedding in 1852. The picture of the hallmarks is shown below. I'm wondering if anyone can help fill the gaps here or correct my understanding?
* E&Co ...
I'm new to this so apologies if this is basic stuff. But we have a family heirloom silver teapot, very intricate and engraved in honour of a wedding in 1852. The picture of the hallmarks is shown below. I'm wondering if anyone can help fill the gaps here or correct my understanding?
* E&Co ...