www.925-1000.com

MyThoughtsExactly wrote:S925 can also indicate Scandinavia.

925S indicates Scandinavia, S925 is what China uses.

It may not even be NA, the majority of NA jewelry uses the Sterling stamp instead of 925.

The mark is Hecho en Mexico (Made in Mexico), the other mark is Alpaca, for the metal, an alloy of nickel, copper and zinc, no silver. The inlay could be Abalone or a blue resin with chips in it to resemble turquoise. Pics would of course help narrow it down.

It says Sterling Mexico around the 925, the eagle 3 mark for Taxco and a conjoined JF for Jeronimo Fuentes who did lots of enamel pieces. They are often mistakenly attributed to Jose Frederico.

That eagle head mark has no relation to the eagle mark used on silver. This most likely made of alpaca, an alloy with no actual silver in it. Unfortunately many alpaca pieces are falsely marked sterling/925.

Since they are Mexican then they aren't Indian. The stones aren't Turquoise, they are white chips of some sort in a colored resin, this technique is used a lot in Mexican jewelry. T marks like these were used after 1979 and there were 100's issued, many were just jobbers, if it was a name maker ther...

The marks are a bit too magnified to see well but they don't seem to be Mexican at all. A pic of the piece is always helpful in ID.

The maker is Willie Haley, Navajo. Maybe the rusty links are replacements?

That's actually somewhat incorrect. There is no one named Tracey Knifewing. Ray Tracey and Knifewing Segura used to collaborate on pieces and used that mark, although I am not sure if I have ever seen one of their dual pieces. Ray Tracey does work like this, and has for a while, and still uses the s...

It isn't Native American, it's Mexican. A common piece by an prolific but unknown maker. The stone is a glass simulant, not real Turquoise.

The S925 mark and construction are indicative of Chinese origin. The 80's date is probably spot on. They are lovely but were inexpensive to purchase and usually made in multiples.

Yup, the date relates to the saints vision, has nothing to do with the year of manufacture.

Definitely not Native American, it's a very new, likely mass produced piece.

The piece is from Mexico City, as shown by the DF mark, Marmolejos worked out of Taxco. It's also an extremely common tourist design, not likely done by a known artisan.

Bangles are solid round/oval bracelets, this is a cuff.
It's most likely Native American/Navajo but I didn't find the mark in my books.
It's highly likely sterling or at least coin/900 silver but would have to be tested to be sure.

It's definitely not Mexican, looks Middle Eastern or Tibetan.
You may want to test it to be sure it's really sterling.

Yup, Felley, a Southwest manufacturing comany, the 90 is the year it was made. I have the matching pendant.

Be careful with that site, it has lot of errors. It's great for a starting point but I always do extra research to be sure it's correct.

It's from India, around the 1980's, an alloy or very low grade silver, sold in quantity at ethnic stores and the like.

It's WMCO for Wheeler Manufacturing