Re: Silver Enamel Cufflinks with unknown Russian Hallmarks
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:14 pm
[/img]Unknown Hallmarks, Your help is always welcomed
.
[/img]Unknown Hallmarks, Your help is always welcomed
.
www.925-1000.com
Hallmarks Database and Silver Research
https://925-1000.com./forum/
Re: Silver Enamel Cufflinks with unknown Russian Hallmarks
Page 1 of 1
[/img]Unknown Hallmarks, Your help is always welcomed
.
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:43 pm
Hi-
the town mark looks like that of Tbilissi (Tiflis) used in the years 1842-1867, 84 is the silver content (875/1000) and AI is the (unknown) maker. The assayer is missing! A little dubious - each cufflink should have the same punches and the marks look a little strange! Fine enamel work was not the main capability of this region....I am not sure if they are original or "upgraded".
Regards
Postnikov
.
the town mark looks like that of Tbilissi (Tiflis) used in the years 1842-1867, 84 is the silver content (875/1000) and AI is the (unknown) maker. The assayer is missing! A little dubious - each cufflink should have the same punches and the marks look a little strange! Fine enamel work was not the main capability of this region....I am not sure if they are original or "upgraded".
Regards
Postnikov
.
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:17 pm
I don't think it's Russian for the same reasons as Postnikov already stated. No assayer, very strange 84 mark, latin letters in Tblisi??? etc. The Tblisi rider by the way rides the other way. However, it might be Polish, but...
.
.
regarding the hallmark
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:08 pm
Thank you, I think the large cartouche is for Moscow, I have seen it wiht 1871 below it. here is a link.. it is numbered 10
http://www.silvercollection.it/russians ... lmark.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
.
http://www.silvercollection.it/russians ... lmark.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
.
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:13 pm
Hi,
I agree with you NAS, before Postnikov had answered I assumed that it was the town mark of Moscow. I can see the slaughtered dragon and Saint George. But is there an explanation for the overstamping?
Best regards/JAKJO
.
I agree with you NAS, before Postnikov had answered I assumed that it was the town mark of Moscow. I can see the slaughtered dragon and Saint George. But is there an explanation for the overstamping?
Best regards/JAKJO
.
Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:10 am
Hmmmm.. there are too many question marks here.
1 Why is the city mark over stamped?
2 This kind of marking was used between 1861 and1879 but the city mark that resembles, note resembles only, Moscow’s mark was used later ->1898 and is rather rare. What would be the year?
3. There is no assayer’s mark. According to the law every item presented on the marked must carry all marks.
4. There is neither a known nor an unknown master with the initials A.I
5. Number 10 in the link is rather dubious, especially the town mark.
6. The mark(s)ing in general looks strange.
.
1 Why is the city mark over stamped?
2 This kind of marking was used between 1861 and1879 but the city mark that resembles, note resembles only, Moscow’s mark was used later ->1898 and is rather rare. What would be the year?
3. There is no assayer’s mark. According to the law every item presented on the marked must carry all marks.
4. There is neither a known nor an unknown master with the initials A.I
5. Number 10 in the link is rather dubious, especially the town mark.
6. The mark(s)ing in general looks strange.
.