Hello,
can somebody help me with these marks (russian?) identification? Especially city mark (double headed crowned eage over date) for 1844 i can not find.
It is all OK, or it can be a fake? Better images, and from entire object, i don't have this time, sorry.
Thanks
M.
84 zolotniki 1844
Re: 84 zolotniki 1844
Hi -
the fakers tried to kind of reproduce the townmark of Minsk, in use until 1848. The assay master ПГ, on duty 1844 -1848 is until today unknown.
A simple fake.
Regards
Postnikov
the fakers tried to kind of reproduce the townmark of Minsk, in use until 1848. The assay master ПГ, on duty 1844 -1848 is until today unknown.
A simple fake.
Regards
Postnikov
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 pm
Re: 84 zolotniki 1844
Can you see the traces of file — original hallmarks were removed and Russian hallmarks struck over? The scratches are too deep to be attributed to cleaning. Once again, only hallmarks are given, the easiest way to make a mistake — even with the picture, sometimes it is difficult to identify a genuine item. Another question is if the particular item worth faking, although, if one paid a lot for steel hallmarking tool he would strike fake marks on every possible item to make profit.
Re: 84 zolotniki 1844
Hi Argentum49 -
you are right with your conclusions. Please remember that many of the fakes are manufactured in countries with cheap manpower! So there is a big profit at the end.
And do not forget: not all things with the stamp 84 are real silver!
Regards
Postnikov
you are right with your conclusions. Please remember that many of the fakes are manufactured in countries with cheap manpower! So there is a big profit at the end.
And do not forget: not all things with the stamp 84 are real silver!
Regards
Postnikov