Scottish Provincial Silversmiths book advice
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 6:36 am
In 2003, I published my Directory of Scottish Provincial Silversmiths & their Marks. Having sold out, I am now working on the production of an illustrated version as a follow up. This will have the addition of about 800 sets of marks illustrated, ignoring ABC-, CAB-type variations, plus all the updates to the original listings, seen, and added, over the years.
The new book will have a few pages of preparatory information, followed by the updated Alphabetical listing.
The Great Plan is to display the makers’ marks two or three to a line, 20-30 per A5 page, thus giving clear identification, each labelled AB 1 — 250; WK 1 — 8, plus maker’s name, as applicable. Both listings will be annotated as to photo number for easy identification.
As I have been working, four possible ways of presenting these marks have so far occurred to me:-
1. The full alphabetical listing, then, the separate town marks, as in the original Directory, followed by 15-20 double sided pages of marks in their town groupings, in alphabetical order, separated by the Town name.
2. The full alphabetical listing, followed by the lists of town marks, each town having the associated pages of photos of marks following, so both are somewhat split up.
3. The full alphabetical listing, followed by the town sections with the listings of marks' on the left pages, and relevant pages of photos facing their town listing, as they are mentioned.
4. The full alphabetical listing on the left pages, faced by the related photos of the marks on the opposite page, town listings to follow, as in the original.
Each method has positive and adverse points, so I have been checking with leading dealers, auctioneers and collectors as to which presentation they consider most user-friendly.
When I asked Trev, he suggested that this forum would be an ideal way to discover the preferred format for collectors. I would be most grateful for all suggestions on the layout preferred.
In anticipation, very many thanks for your help.
Richard
The new book will have a few pages of preparatory information, followed by the updated Alphabetical listing.
The Great Plan is to display the makers’ marks two or three to a line, 20-30 per A5 page, thus giving clear identification, each labelled AB 1 — 250; WK 1 — 8, plus maker’s name, as applicable. Both listings will be annotated as to photo number for easy identification.
As I have been working, four possible ways of presenting these marks have so far occurred to me:-
1. The full alphabetical listing, then, the separate town marks, as in the original Directory, followed by 15-20 double sided pages of marks in their town groupings, in alphabetical order, separated by the Town name.
2. The full alphabetical listing, followed by the lists of town marks, each town having the associated pages of photos of marks following, so both are somewhat split up.
3. The full alphabetical listing, followed by the town sections with the listings of marks' on the left pages, and relevant pages of photos facing their town listing, as they are mentioned.
4. The full alphabetical listing on the left pages, faced by the related photos of the marks on the opposite page, town listings to follow, as in the original.
Each method has positive and adverse points, so I have been checking with leading dealers, auctioneers and collectors as to which presentation they consider most user-friendly.
When I asked Trev, he suggested that this forum would be an ideal way to discover the preferred format for collectors. I would be most grateful for all suggestions on the layout preferred.
In anticipation, very many thanks for your help.
Richard