Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Recently acquired a bowl and has the combine city & standard mark and the maker's mark (HA) but without Assayer's mark. Just wondering if the bowl genuine or fake?
It is hardly a fake and there is an assaying mark, no doubts about that. The 84 with St Petersburg's town crest in an oval frame is the assaying mark used 1882-1899. The maker is , however, more difficult. It could be Aleksey Nasedkin 1883-1905 but I'm not sure because the mark is unclear and could as well be seen as ДΗ (latin DN). Who that may be I don't know, sorry.
Thanks for the reply, I was abit skeptical as I know there are alot of fakes on the market plus from what I gather they were really strict with the hallmarking and must consist of a Maker's, Assayer's, Silver Standard and a Town Mark.
Sorry, but you are mistaking now, You didn't read everything. This slipped your eyes: http://www.925-1000.com/Frussia_assay_variations.html. This particular assaying mark is called "dvoinik" i.e. double because it has only two elements, onlyt the fineness and town crest.
Ah, thanks for pointing it out, didn't know how I missed that part. Upon further research this may be mark of HOLMSTROM, August Wilhelm a senior member of Fabergé's workshop.
Please forget Holmström. It is no circumstances him. Holmström was an outstanding goldsmith working for Fabergé only. The quality of your bowl is not good enough.
In St. Petersburg there was some silversmiths worked with A.N. initials ( Cyrillics - А.Н.).
For example: for Trading House "Morozov" worked silversmith A.N.: