Help reading a worn-out hallmark on a gold cross
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 4:36 am
Hi,
I've been trying to identify this gold cross which is a recently recovered family heirloom, anecdotally going back into Australian mid C19th (great-great-grandmother!).
I can see the Birmingham anchor, and clearly the "P. Bros" maker mark which appears similar to the Purcell Bros. although they have an swept angle/pointy sides in the images I've found so far, and apparently were only making during the 1930-40s which doesn't fit our story. This site lists them, producing silver flatware http://www.silvermakersmarks.co.uk/Make ... ham-P.html which again isn't quite right...
I think I can see a serif 'a' date mark, although it appears at the wrong end of the normal sequence? If it is an 'a' date, this could be 1900, 1875 (but it's not in a circle), or 1798 which seems unlikely! The bottom is worn away which makes it hard to see the rectangle shape.
The middle section is very worn, and I am struggling to make anything out.
I've taken such a lot of pictures as the angle of the light shows up different aspects.
The cross is attached to a gold wedding ring by a small gold octagonal ring, (which seems carefully welded/soldered and seems like it was made to wear rather than just fixing it together for storage). The two items are supposed to be related so should share similar dates.
From my limited knowledge I can see a typical sequence, with SH as the maker mark. 9-375 i.e. 9 carats, the Birmingham anchor, then a serif U date mark, and an O or two crescents.
Looking at the 'U' date, I am confused, as it would appear to be the 'U' from 1869 if they hadn't changed to a circle at the S in 1867. None of the other U's make sense - especially if what I've read is true that the rest of the hallmarks take the outer shape of the date mark - which is clearly a chamfered rectangle.
Finally I've not been able to find the meaning of the split [O] or facing crescents - which seems separate and is in a different rectangle so perhaps applied later. I guess it could be an additional duty/import mark of some kind, but none I've seen on various websites.
This is the first time I've tried to decipher any hallmarks so apologies if I've got any of this wrong.
Would appreciate any help with identifying these.
thanks.
I've been trying to identify this gold cross which is a recently recovered family heirloom, anecdotally going back into Australian mid C19th (great-great-grandmother!).
I can see the Birmingham anchor, and clearly the "P. Bros" maker mark which appears similar to the Purcell Bros. although they have an swept angle/pointy sides in the images I've found so far, and apparently were only making during the 1930-40s which doesn't fit our story. This site lists them, producing silver flatware http://www.silvermakersmarks.co.uk/Make ... ham-P.html which again isn't quite right...
I think I can see a serif 'a' date mark, although it appears at the wrong end of the normal sequence? If it is an 'a' date, this could be 1900, 1875 (but it's not in a circle), or 1798 which seems unlikely! The bottom is worn away which makes it hard to see the rectangle shape.
The middle section is very worn, and I am struggling to make anything out.
I've taken such a lot of pictures as the angle of the light shows up different aspects.
The cross is attached to a gold wedding ring by a small gold octagonal ring, (which seems carefully welded/soldered and seems like it was made to wear rather than just fixing it together for storage). The two items are supposed to be related so should share similar dates.
From my limited knowledge I can see a typical sequence, with SH as the maker mark. 9-375 i.e. 9 carats, the Birmingham anchor, then a serif U date mark, and an O or two crescents.
Looking at the 'U' date, I am confused, as it would appear to be the 'U' from 1869 if they hadn't changed to a circle at the S in 1867. None of the other U's make sense - especially if what I've read is true that the rest of the hallmarks take the outer shape of the date mark - which is clearly a chamfered rectangle.
Finally I've not been able to find the meaning of the split [O] or facing crescents - which seems separate and is in a different rectangle so perhaps applied later. I guess it could be an additional duty/import mark of some kind, but none I've seen on various websites.
This is the first time I've tried to decipher any hallmarks so apologies if I've got any of this wrong.
Would appreciate any help with identifying these.
thanks.