Page 1 of 1

French Oval Serving Platter with Bigorne

Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 6:23 pm
by MGArgent
Hi Forum,

I am hoping to confirm the maker of this French serving platter.

The maker's mark has the letters "A D" with a bird, which I believe is for Alphonse Debain (the mark in use from 1883-1911).

What I am unsure of is the following:
  • Alphonse Dutac also used the letters "A D" with a bird (pigeon).
  • The mark is a bit different than other examples I have come across attributed to either Debain or Dutac
    • The bird is slightly different
    • The letter "A" is flat at the top instead of pointed
I think the most likely explanation is that this is a variation of Alphonse Debain's mark (please confirm).

Images of the platter:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Other maker's marks that have been attributed to both Alphonse Debain and Alphonse Dutac (I have seen both marks attributed separately to both makers because of the similarity):

Image

Image

Re: French Oval Serving Platter with Bigorne

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2020 4:17 am
by AG2012
Hi,
More similar to a pigeon of Alphonse Dutac, but really there is a difference, both in letters and the bird.
Regards
Image
Image

Re: French Oval Serving Platter with Bigorne

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2020 6:46 am
by JayT
Debain’s symbol is a woodcock (une bécasse). Although I’m a bit ornithologically challenged, my vote goes to Debain as maker of your platter. The long beak and the profile in general of your mark resembles a woodcock to me.

Re: French Oval Serving Platter with Bigorne

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2020 10:52 am
by JayT
P.S.
Debain was a manufacturing silversmith, with high production. This type of hollowware would be typical of his manufacture.
Dutac on the other hand was a manufacturing jeweller. While jewellers did make silver tableware, a large piece of hollowware would not likely be part of his line of goods.
I wouldn’t hesitate to attribute your object to Debain.
Hope this helps you to decide.

Re: French Oval Serving Platter with Bigorne

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:19 am
by MGArgent
I appreciate the excellent input from you both.

Having the three marks arranged in close proximity makes for a better comparison, and I would agree that this mark doesn't really look like either of the other two.

I agree with JayT that the long beak is quite distinctive and certainly resembles that of a woodcock (perhaps even to a greater extent than the mark already attributed to Alphonse Debain).

To my mind, this must be an alternate mark of Alphonse Debain.

Thanks again.