Hello Mistermilk
F.G.W in a cut cornered rectangular punch= Frederick George Warriner, registered as 'School Teacher (metalwork)'; Shenley Lane, Birmingham; Registered 2 punches on 20th November 1944. Date letter of your tankard would be 'V' for 1945-6 not 1920
I hope this helps
Kind regards
Craig
Search found 27 matches
- Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:38 am
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: FGW Birmingham
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10755
- Fri Jul 06, 2018 6:11 am
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: Southern Suburbs Horticultural Society Medal
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7882
Re: Southern Suburbs Horticultural Society Medal
Sponsor mark for Sampson Marks & Co. listed as 'Shipping merchants' first registered with Birmingham Assay Office 28th May 1907 and finally 30 August 1939. Business address- 28A Frederick Street, Birmingham. Private address given as Johannesburg, South Africa.
Hope this helps.
Hope this helps.
- Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:06 pm
- Forum: Gold Marks - Worldwide
- Topic: Gold Ring Discrepancy
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7375
Re: Gold Ring Discrepancy
Hello CaptDarling The special town mark of the anchor flanked by 2 'c's denoting the bi-centenery of the Birmingham Assay Office was only used on certain punches and were used at the request of the maker, the other punches just had the usual anchor symbol. Your ring is dated 1973-4. As for the maker...
- Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:34 am
- Forum: European Jewelry
- Topic: Help with silver locket
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6519
Re: Help with silver locket
Hello jonesjnr, Sorry to add another possibility but the date letter is 'h' for 1882-3. Maker is Edwin Page 1st registered with Birmingham Assay Office in 1879 first as a jeweller then as a chain maker, first address given as 25 Hylton Street and then 33 Hylton Street, Birmingham. The lack of a duty...
- Sun Dec 11, 2016 8:42 pm
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: Birmingham Tray - Help Needed
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7027
Re: Birmingham Tray - Help Needed
Hello Emmajayne1 It was not unusual for the manufacturer to stamp the maker's mark onto a piece prior to sending the item in for hallmarking which is why we often see poorly marked maker's marks next to crisp hallmarks. Also (ref the previous reply) duty was not collected by the Assay offices on sil...
- Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:03 am
- Forum: Gold Marks - Worldwide
- Topic: Dating gold ring
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4005
Re: Dating gold ring
Hello Pavel,
Afraid you are correct in thinking it's 'not very old' date letter is for 1992- no decimal point before the 375 indicates that it has to be later than 1975. I hope this helps.
Kind regards
Craig
Afraid you are correct in thinking it's 'not very old' date letter is for 1992- no decimal point before the 375 indicates that it has to be later than 1975. I hope this helps.
Kind regards
Craig
- Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:19 am
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: Birmingham Maker's Mark "R.J" in oval? Cig case
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5096
Re: Birmingham Maker's Mark "R.J" in oval? Cig case
Hello Teslagirl,
Mark is for R.Jordan registered as a Silversmith, 42 Southwark Park Road, London. first registered at Birmingham 14th May 1902 and last registered 23 May 1916.
Hope this helps
Craig
Mark is for R.Jordan registered as a Silversmith, 42 Southwark Park Road, London. first registered at Birmingham 14th May 1902 and last registered 23 May 1916.
Hope this helps
Craig
- Thu May 19, 2016 6:51 am
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: General Question on Birmingham Hallmarks
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6405
Re: General Question on Birmingham Hallmarks
Hello KJ, Back to your original question as to why the duty mark and date letter were marked when you quite rightlly state that it is more usual to have the part mark of lion passant ant date letter. Due to the heavily textured nature of your piece the usual punch (which would have been in the form ...
- Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:49 am
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: S.T.S Unknown Maker. Cream Jug, 1902
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4057
Re: S.T.S Unknown Maker. Cream Jug, 1902
Sponsor mark Sydney Thomas Steel, retail jeweller, Cheltenham 1st registered 27th October 1897. Jug definitely an example of a 'change of usage' christening mug to cream jug.
hope this helps, kind regards
Craig
hope this helps, kind regards
Craig
- Thu Mar 17, 2016 6:42 pm
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: William Hutton & Sons?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4343
Re: William Hutton & Sons?
Hello AG2012, A bad marking day by the manufacturer. Many manufacturers held their own maker's punches and marked them prior to hallmarking, the item would then be tested and the rest of the hallmark would be applied which is why we see so many poorly marked maker's marks (marked by silversmiths) ne...
- Thu Mar 17, 2016 6:26 pm
- Forum: European Jewelry
- Topic: HELP ME! with identification brooch
- Replies: 9
- Views: 23536
Re: HELP ME! with identification brooch
Hello Oerizet, Maker's mark poorly struck is A.J.S for Arthur John Smith, jewellery manufacturer 46 Frederick Street, Birmingham. Chester at this period had a forwarding office in Birmingham it was sometimes (because Birmingham Assay Office was so busy) quicker to send items to Chester for marking t...
- Wed May 20, 2015 9:46 am
- Forum: European Jewelry
- Topic: Unknown makers mark on sterling silver locket
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3904
Re: Unknown makers mark on sterling silver locket
Hello Thistle, seller was correct date is 1887-8 (no duty mark because lockets were exempt from hallmarking and therefore exempt from duty), the maker possibly JF for James Fenton- 74 Great Hampton Street, Birmingham. With the thistle, shamrock and rose motif may have been a 50th jubilee commemorati...
- Mon Feb 23, 2015 1:44 pm
- Forum: British Hallmarks - Single Image
- Topic: S L & S Ld Hallmark
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6697
Re: S L & S Ld Hallmark
Hello,
Maker's mark is for S. Lesser and Sons Limited of Houndsditch, London. Registered as 'merchants' registered at Birmingham Assay Office 20th August 1902 (as Samuel Lesser) and 5th June 19013 (as S. Lesser and Sons Limited). Date letter for 1932-33. I hope this helps.
Maker's mark is for S. Lesser and Sons Limited of Houndsditch, London. Registered as 'merchants' registered at Birmingham Assay Office 20th August 1902 (as Samuel Lesser) and 5th June 19013 (as S. Lesser and Sons Limited). Date letter for 1932-33. I hope this helps.
- Sat Nov 22, 2014 12:37 pm
- Forum: European Jewelry
- Topic: 1882 bangles no duty marks
- Replies: 12
- Views: 8101
Re: 1882 bangles no duty marks
Thank you Trev for correcting my date this one is indeed 'h' for 1882-3, it was the bangle in the other thread I was confusing it with! Of course William Westwood would have been on the side of the Birmingham trade he was at this time presiding over the largest Assay Office in the World but it is a ...
- Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:26 am
- Forum: European Jewelry
- Topic: 1882 bangles no duty marks
- Replies: 12
- Views: 8101
Re: 1882 bangles no duty marks
Hello Steve, Just to put to rest any thoughts anyone has about Birmingham Assay Office not stamping and collecting duty on precious metals in this period (they would have until duty was abolished in May 1890) The bangles in question (similar to the large oval lockets of the period) were exempt from ...
- Tue May 13, 2014 5:18 pm
- Forum: European Jewelry
- Topic: Unknown maker's mark (silver ring with unknown stone)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 18753
Re: Unknown maker's mark (silver ring with unknown stone)
Hello SasaPK,
Your mark is not Chester but London for 1976, if you contact the London Assay Office they may be able to help with the sponsor mark.
Kind regards
Craig
Your mark is not Chester but London for 1976, if you contact the London Assay Office they may be able to help with the sponsor mark.
Kind regards
Craig
- Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:44 am
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: T&Co unknown mark
- Replies: 12
- Views: 8336
Re: T&Co unknown mark
I've looked up the maker- Terry and Co.; registered as 'Diamond merchants, gold and silversmiths' ;Manchester 1st registered with Birmingham Assay Office on 9th July 1964. I hope this clears up any doubts.
Kind regards
Craig
Kind regards
Craig
- Wed Apr 09, 2014 3:44 am
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: T&Co unknown mark
- Replies: 12
- Views: 8336
Re: T&Co unknown mark
Hello Shwar,
Your date letter is actually for 1967-8- I hope this helps.
kind regards
Craig
Your date letter is actually for 1967-8- I hope this helps.
kind regards
Craig
- Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:58 am
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: Edward Sawyer Spoon 1777
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12828
Re: Edward Sawyer Spoon 1777
Hello Rhodri, I can't tell you much but he registered with the birmingham Assay Office in 1773/1774 (the Manufacturers' Register was not dated before 1801) the address given was No 19 Great Charles Street, Birmingham. His trade was given as 'spoon maker' interesting to note the only person to give t...
- Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:47 am
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: Silver Pencil Date & Maker
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4704
Re: Silver Pencil Date & Maker
Hello both, Date letter looks to be the gothic 'x' instead of gothic 'r' I think the date is for 1897/98 and the makers mark is Arthur Downing registered as a Goldsmith and Jewellers at 25 Upper Hockley St, Birmingham. 1st registered 12 October 1883. Unusual to see both a hyphen and pellet in the sa...