Search found 9 matches
- Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:07 pm
- Forum: London Hallmarks
- Topic: Later Georgian knife?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2342
Later Georgian knife?
Given the rule of thumb advisory for British silver hallmarks stated on this site, my extremely limited library on the topic (pp 109-114 in a single knife collector book) does mention that the makers mark and date letter in the later years of this era (1773-c.1830) were often struck on a hidden part...
- Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:35 pm
- Forum: British Hallmarks - Single Image
- Topic: Victorian Fruit Knife hallmarks Help wanted
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3299
Re: Victorian Fruit Knife hallmarks Help wanted
Almost right. The date is 1849 from the Victoria duty mark and the style of the date letter. Phil At close examination, the date marks of different eras within the various city guilds appear, to me, nearly distinguishable, as, it seems, to also be the case with the op of this thread. So am I correc...
- Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:19 am
- Forum: Silverplate Trademarks - Worldwide
- Topic: 1889 Plate Fruit Knife
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3189
Re: 1889 Plate Fruit Knife
Hi Bill, That's a Gorham piece. See: http://www.925-1000.com/Gorham_Date_Code.html Please keep your images within the 7" max. guidelines. Posting Requirements Trev. Thanks and apologies - the error message I received when trying to upload even larger images advised me of 1000 pixels/side - the...
- Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:24 am
- Forum: Silverplate Trademarks - Worldwide
- Topic: 1889 Plate Fruit Knife
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3189
1889 Plate Fruit Knife
I think I'm in the right forum - the marks faux hallmarks? The first looks like a right facing lion or other animal, an anchor, what looks like an Old English upper case "M" in a square and the 750 stamp near the back tang . One cartouche is engraved "1889". Thanks, again, and in...
- Sat Nov 23, 2013 11:29 pm
- Forum: Silverplate Trademarks - Worldwide
- Topic: Wm. Rogers & Son (2nd Partnership) 1868-1873
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1040
Wm. Rogers & Son (2nd Partnership) 1868-1873
This Hartford, CT firm's second incarnation http://www.silvercollection.it/ROGERSSILVERMANUFACTURERS.html was known to make fruit knives but am I to assume that due to the lack of any silver mark that the knife is plate? There is no magnetic attraction to any part of the knife. Thanks! - Bill http:/...
- Sat Nov 23, 2013 2:34 pm
- Forum: Sheffield Hallmarks
- Topic: John or Joseph Law?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5750
Re: John or Joseph Law?
At dognose and silvermakersmarks: I see now the distinction between the actual published records of the Sheffield Assay Office Register and the Sheffield Maker's Mark Menu on this website. Thanks to you both for your insight assistance.
Bill
Bill
- Sat Nov 23, 2013 2:27 pm
- Forum: Sheffield Hallmarks
- Topic: John or Joseph Law?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5750
Re: John or Joseph Law?
Hi, Welcome to the Forum. My initial thoughts were the same as Phil's, that the mark is not in the Sheffield Assay Office Register , but B.W. Watson in his preface to the book states "In some cases manufacturers have used the same design of mark for a long term of years and new entries have be...
- Sat Nov 23, 2013 2:19 pm
- Forum: Sheffield Hallmarks
- Topic: John or Joseph Law?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5750
Re: John or Joseph Law?
In fact both John Law's and Joseph Law's marks are shown in the Sheffield Register(1) as [I·L]. The mark on your fruit knife seems to have escaped reference so it may not even be a Law mark. I have seen it on fruit knives dated between 1828 and 1830. Phil (1) Watson, B.W. - The Sheffield Assay Off...
- Sat Nov 23, 2013 5:36 am
- Forum: Sheffield Hallmarks
- Topic: John or Joseph Law?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5750
John or Joseph Law?
I know John Law is IL, Joseph I.L, but the date code is 1838 and John Law is 1790 and Joseph registered 1824 so its possible that its John Law and the maker overlaps Joseph but I haven't been able to find examples of either maker to figure it out. Any help is appreciated, thanks. http://www.flickr.c...