All is now clear. Queen Anne escaped my attention as there is no set of English hallmarks.
Thank you.
Is the IO punch mark, which I assume is the maker's mark, attributable?
And if it is the maker's mark, then how would the maker having put his mark on it, expect to get away with not paying duty?
Search found 6 matches
- Fri Jun 08, 2018 9:52 am
- Forum: Other Countries
- Topic: Punch Ladle
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3863
- Wed Jun 06, 2018 1:38 pm
- Forum: Provincial & Colonial Marks
- Topic: Perth Spoon
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9574
Re: Perth Spoon
Thank you.
- Wed Jun 06, 2018 11:35 am
- Forum: Provincial & Colonial Marks
- Topic: Perth Spoon
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9574
Perth Spoon
When researching this mark, attributed to Robert Keay, I found that there were two Robert Keay's, designated Robert I and Robert II. The images I viewed for both look similar. Any opinions if this is I or II? Robert I is reported as active 1791-1825 and Robert II 1839-1856. https://s20.postimg.cc/4r...
- Sun Jun 03, 2018 2:23 pm
- Forum: Other Countries
- Topic: Punch Ladle
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3863
Punch Ladle
I would appreciate help in identifying this punch ladle. The coin set into the bowl is dated and I think it is 1710, but I'm not confident. That of course doesn't provide a date for the ladle as an older coin probably would have been used. The script round the coin is as follows, Tails side: MAG BRI...
- Sat Jun 02, 2018 5:31 pm
- Forum: Scottish Hallmarks
- Topic: Edinburgh Spoons
- Replies: 4
- Views: 9520
Re: Edinburgh Spoons
Thanks for the responses.
It all adds to the pleasure of ownership.
It all adds to the pleasure of ownership.
- Fri Jun 01, 2018 4:18 pm
- Forum: Scottish Hallmarks
- Topic: Edinburgh Spoons
- Replies: 4
- Views: 9520