www.925-1000.com

dognose wrote: ↑Tue Sep 12, 2023 2:49 am Hi,

Carlo Margaroli was recorded as an importer, rather than a manufacturer, so that likely accounts for the two different '925' marks, one being applied by the actual maker.

Trev.

Thank you dognose, this clarifies a lot.

According to another source, Margaroli had assigned the mark on 7/6/71 instead of 8/11/1971 On that date could not yet be available the new marks, the drawing of which were published in the official gazette of 17/8/1971, and in all likelihood they were not available in November 1971 either. Thank y...

Follow the link in thread…seems to have begun under older system (pre-1968) even though footnotes are listing 1971 era: https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=139794&hilit=novara#p139794 Thank you very much for your response. This adds some mystery in that if the hallmark was registered...

Hello everybody I need your help in dating a ring in my possession. The hallmark is Italian and it is "22 NO", I attach photos for clarity. Next to the mark is the 925 law wording and 925 also appears inside the ring. What does the double presence of 925 mean? Also, how come there is no st...