Dear Board members,
I would be grateful for your input on this tea and coffee set's marks:http://i1102.photobucket.com/albums/g44 ... G_1021.jpg
http://s1102.photobucket.com/user/fsepa ... 2.jpg.html
All the pieces bear the pattern number 3740, however only one, the sugar bowl, is marked with the the 'M' mark.
My on-line search indicates an 1873 circa date of production. Could the lack of the 'M' mark be due to the fact that the company was going through changes of directors in that year?
Also, I would be grateful for your comments on the 'A' mark which appears on all five pieces.
Thanks in advance for your comments.
Fred
Tiffany mark mystery-- Help appreciated
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 5:32 pm
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 5:32 pm
Re: Tiffany mark mystery-- Help appreciated
Sorry for the badly posted link:
http://s1102.photobucket.com/user/fsepa ... sort=3&o=0
http://s1102.photobucket.com/user/fsepa ... sort=3&o=0
-
- co-admin
- Posts: 2500
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:42 am
- Location: Orlando, Florida
- Contact:
Re: Tiffany mark mystery-- Help appreciated
Hi, you might try posting embedded images of the marks and pieces relating to this post - many will not click on links, and suspect most do not want to search through numerous images for the pertinent pics...
Feel sure there is method on Photobucket for embedding.
~Cheryl
Feel sure there is method on Photobucket for embedding.
~Cheryl
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 5:32 pm
Re: Tiffany mark mystery-- Help appreciated
Hi Cheryl,
Thank you for the helpful piece of advice. You are absolutely right.
Regards,
Fred
Thank you for the helpful piece of advice. You are absolutely right.
Regards,
Fred
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 5:32 pm
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 5:32 pm
Re: Tiffany mark mystery-- Help appreciated
Interesting. You have a pattern from approximately 1872-1873, you have makers marks that not used until at least 1943, which could be possible. But the director's mark of an A...that seems impossible, as that is an unknown mark, also an unknown makers mark for that period. Looks highly suspicious.