John Wirgman, London 1748?
Best,
Thomas
London 1748
-
byronbay55
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:50 am
London 1748
Hi!
John Wirgman, London 1748?
Best,
Thomas
John Wirgman, London 1748?
Best,
Thomas
-
byronbay55
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:50 am
Re: London 1748
No, sorry, its "JM" or "WL", right?
-
silvermakersmarks
- co-admin
- Posts: 1802
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:22 am
- Location: Hertfordshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: London 1748
No, it's TM - Thomas Mason; this mark dated 23.9.1745.
Phil
Phil
-
byronbay55
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:50 am
Re: London 1748
Thanks agian Phil, I guess someone has to be the noob in here ;)
Re: London 1748
Hi Thomas,
The repoussage of this George II mug has been added later, during the reign of Queen Victoria, the mug has been "Victorianized".
Best,
Peter.
The repoussage of this George II mug has been added later, during the reign of Queen Victoria, the mug has been "Victorianized".
Best,
Peter.
-
byronbay55
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:50 am
Re: London 1748
Yup, I know, thx Peter.oel wrote:Hi Thomas,
The repoussage of this George II mug has been added later, during the reign of Queen Victoria, the mug has been "Victorianized".
Best,
Peter.
Not on this item, but in others I've seen it looks like they added a layer of pre-chased/embossed sheet of silver...did they ever do that?? If I remember correct the inside is then still plane.
Best,
Thomas
Re: London 1748
Hi Thomas,
Although I do not know it would not surprise me, “Victorians” were very inventive and creative.
Peter
Although I do not know it would not surprise me, “Victorians” were very inventive and creative.
Peter
Re: London 1748
Irrespective of its origins or later work it is lovely.