Hi Golstein,
I don't know a lot about Russian silver, niello etc, but I can read, find information and connect facts. Also have some experience in antiques. Silver does not mean only silver items like cuttlery etc, but it's also part of many other items, particularly in high quality weapons, so I've seen a lot of that.
Thank you very much for recognising assayer's city and period. I didn't see enough of them to recognise from partially destroyed hallmark.
Re Klingert - you are not right, he worked in niello. Maybe not himself personally, but his workshop, with his stamps. As you probably know, serious manufactories had plenty of people working, not only master. I.e. Jean-Henri Riesener, the best cabinetmaker in L.XVI period in France, had about 100-150 people working for him. Same with old master paintings (Rubens usually was making the composition and painted persons, background was made by his employees or other artists he cooperated with. I don't believe businesman like Kliengert left aside one of techniques demanded by a market. Maybe he didn;t make it with his hands, maybe he subcontracted, does not matter, it was stapmed by him.
Check some Russian items on links below. You can say it's all fake, but sorry, I do believe Russians are the best to recognise their works of art. On the forum I show you links, items were offered to sell. Believe, if it's fake, it would be many comments about it, I have experience on same and other Russian forums in other fields of collecting.
Links:
https://forums-su.com/viewtopic.php?f=431&t=639826 cigarette case, enough to have short view to see that it's from same hand as the cigar box I asked about.
Primo - central medalion has different shape, but it's made exactly the same, using same techniques and same decor.
Secundo - look on silver between niello - it's very characteristic with small dots made with sharp tool. This kind of decor is not presented on most of niello items, where it's usually mirror polished.
Tertio - niello kind of decor - very delicate floral pattern with precise shading making it alive. Compare to most of late 19th / early 20th c. niello objects, where you see irregular black spots, nothing close to precise drawing. Obviously, there are some better niello items, like a spoon you showed in one of posts, but I can see huge differences to Klingert's (workshop?) work, which (for me) has some characteristic style.
https://forums-su.com/viewtopic.php?f=431&t=652336 - set of spoons, little different decor, but you can see punched dots on silver, IMHO characteristic for Klingert's workshop.
https://forums-su.com/viewtopic.php?f=431&t=478924 - very similar cigar box, but in quite bad condition, IMO overcleaned, what partially damaged the original pattern. Anyway, particularly on the picture of front, with less damages, you can see characteristic dots on silver and same floral design with shades as on other works above. Medallion is also in the same style.
https://forums-su.com/viewtopic.php?f=431&t=632311 - different item, additionally decorated with very well engraved troyka. Notice that "frame" around engraved picture is same as on medalions above. On other side is same style made medalion as on cigar box and cigarettes boxes. When you look on niello decor around it, it jas or stylistic forms wich are IMHO characteristic for niello decor.
When I checked some niello works with Klingert's stamp presented in Russia, I came to the obvious conclusion: Klingert or his workshop offered niellod items with his stamps.
On the item I asked about it's not "poor quality niello", as you written. Poor quality niello is in popular items, like series of souvenirs with Kavkaz niello descirption (example:
http://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopic ... 46&t=48781 - poor quality engravement on silver, not precise niello, no shades). Cigar box has much better quality. I will make some close up pictures to show you the difference, if you don't see it. Stop talking about your thoughts, published here as revealed truth. If you want to learn something - examining item is not only looking on stamps and shouting on people asking here for help from position of knowing all. You should recognise style of maker, techniques, quality of work, type of item, period it was made (if i.e. decoration patterns could be used in this time), compare to originals... etc, etc. As I can see, you make several mistakes in recognising, you are simple to confident in yourself, few books you have and your experience (which I do respect). Forum is place for discussion not posting opinions closing the subject "because I know the best".
Best regards,
Dane
Goldstein wrote:Hi Dane111 -
I do not know how much you know about Russian silver, niello and the different makers.
The crippelt marks show the following:
Assaymark Moscow (1873-1877 in use, on your cigar container exact date not legible).
![Image](https://abload.de/img/p1090273kouj1.jpg)
Maker´s mark ГK (GK) could be Gustav Klingert - but he did not work in niello - just in case he sold niello from contractors (we never heared of that) - the quality is not good enough for his standards, besides the mark is not like all the different from him known marks. Facit: No Klingert object!
The object is authentic - but the maker is for me unknown.
Regards
Goldstein