Unusual set of hallmarks

MARK IMAGE REQUIRED
Post Reply
ds1969
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 4:33 am

Unusual set of hallmarks

Post by ds1969 »

I bought a bracelet with amber. It has a very unusual set of hallmarks.
First, rectangular - only digits 925.
Second, also rectangular - letter G, 925, the head (looks to the right).
Third: head in the circle.
Fourth - apparently, the brand of the firm - something like a stylized letter ii.
I've never seen such hallmarks.
I will be grateful for any clues.
Image
dognose
Site Admin
Posts: 62015
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: England

Re: Unusual set of hallmarks

Post by dognose »

ds1969
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 4:33 am

Re: Unusual set of hallmarks

Post by ds1969 »

dognose wrote:Hi,

It's Polish. See: http://www.925-1000.com/Fpoland_marks_1.html

Trev.
Thanks!
Traintime
contributor
Posts: 2914
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:44 pm

Re: Unusual set of hallmarks

Post by Traintime »

So, Sterling Gdansk after 1986. Now can we explain the (right facing 1963-) "Re-marking on silver" head stamp useage? Is it used to re-verify quality on older era silver with prior marks?
ds1969
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 4:33 am

Re: Unusual set of hallmarks

Post by ds1969 »

Traintime wrote:So, Sterling after 1986. Now can we explain the (right facing 1963-) "Re-marking on silver" head stamp useage? Is it used to re-verify quality on older era silver with prior marks?
I have the same question.
It is interesting that Gdansk hallmark looks more newer that "re-marking".
Why?
Traintime
contributor
Posts: 2914
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:44 pm

Re: Unusual set of hallmarks

Post by Traintime »

I take it your "Fourth" mark is actually the first mark (far left). Perhaps a better photo of #'s 1 & 2 (from left) might explain the "Re-mark" mark? Don't know why they would mark it a third time after 1986. Not an expert..just study photos, search the threads, and try to make sense of what is oddball.
Post Reply

Return to “Silver Jewelry - Single Image”