Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
I need I little help, I can't identify the maker nor the town where this piece was manufactured.
The assay master, I think that should be Josef Sosnkowski, but can't find anything referent to the mark С.Б. Can someone identify the maker and town please?
I need I little help, I can't identify the maker nor the town where this piece was manufactured.
The assay master, I think that should be Josef Sosnkowski, but can't find anything referent to the mark С.Б. Can someone identify the maker and town please?
Thanks in advance
Hi,
I think the city is Warsaw as the assay master is Josef Sosnkowski who worked in Warsaw from 1869 until 1896.
No idea about the maker
Hi,
It is С dot Б, not vice versa.
Only in Hungarian family name stands first.
From PL:
The only OC assayer was unknown assayer in St Peterburg
PL 1188 (unknown assayer 1875 - 1886) С dot Б matches Semen Bogdanov in StPeterburg. (PL 1403)
It is Warsaw and the assayer is Osip Sosnkovsky as Goldstein already pointed out. Postnikova's #1188 is a mistake. Nothing indicates that Sosnkovsky would have ever assayed in St- Petersburg. The mark OC belongs undoubtedly to Warsaw. As a matter of fact, St Petersburg did not use the double headed eagle anymore as a town mark during the 19th century but the crossed anchor grapnel and scepter.
As AG2012 mentioned there is a Semen Bogdanov in St. P at that time but that is a pure coincidence.
For the records: There is another mistake on the same page in Postnikova.
#1178 (IB) has nothing to do with St. Petersburg. The mark belongs to assayer Jan Biedgunkowsky in Warsaw 1860-1865.
Unfortunately there are many mistakes in Postnikova. Just to mention a big one; Minsk on page 201. Most of the maker's marks as well as assayers' marks #1894 (Walery Kostrzebsky 1852-1860) and #1898 (earlier mentioned Osip Sosnkowsky) belong to Warsaw.
Sorry a bit out of topic, but important info anyway.
@AG2012
I was writing while your comment came in. Fine that we agree. However, please do not refer to Watts, it is one of the poor copies of Postnikova.
Thanks for your answers!
The piece in question is from my father who is antiquarian, I will ask him to send me a photo of the piece to put here.
Once again, thank you very much for your help !!