English, but where?
English, but where?
Came across this lovely serving spoon, 9" in length.
Any thoughts on where it was made -- if the mark is even decipherable.
Any thoughts on where it was made -- if the mark is even decipherable.
Re: English, but where?
Hi,
Not English. That set of marks has now been attributed to Bailey & Co. of Philadelphia.
Trev.
Not English. That set of marks has now been attributed to Bailey & Co. of Philadelphia.
Trev.
Re: English, but where?
Well, fool me twice... A few years ago these Bailey marks fooled me also.
Thanks for the reminder that forgetfulness comes with advancing age!
Thanks for the reminder that forgetfulness comes with advancing age!
Re: English, but where?
Bailey & Co. - Philadelphia - 1876
Trev.
Re: English, but where?
I also just learned that the lion/S/shield mark was used beginning in 1855 to denote sterling silver. Previous to that, the eagle/U/shield mark was used beginning around 1850 to denote coin silver.
Re: English, but where?
I would expect these marks to be George Sharp as the manufacturer and Bailey & Co as the retailer.
Re: English, but where?
"In the early 1850s, Bailey & Co.'s coin silver pieces (which is marked by an eagle, 'U' and shield) sometimes include other marks - a star and occasionally an elephant. Do these marks indicate an outside supplier or maker (Taylor & Lawrie?) or something internal like a 'journeyman's mark' on British silver. We don't know. From this information, we can infer that the extra lions that appear about 1855 are associated with the sterling standard, not George Sharp."
--Spencer Marks, Ltd.
--Spencer Marks, Ltd.
-
- contributor
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:22 pm
Re: English, but where?
The S mark with lion and shield are attributed to George Sharp who was a supplier to Bailey & co. The extra lion in this case is the lion towards the backside center of the bowl (on the drop).
Re: English, but where?
See: 'Some Bailey & Co. Marks and Their Significance' - D. Albert Soeffing - Silver Magazine - November/December 1995.
Trev.
Trev.
Re: English, but where?
Found in Philadelphia and Its Manufactures, A Hand-book 1858.
Re: English, but where?
This post is to correct my last post in this thread.silverly wrote:I would expect these marks to be George Sharp as the manufacturer and Bailey & Co as the retailer.
From the The Presbyterian Historical Almanac and Annual Remembrancer ... Joseph M. Wilson · 1859 pg 6
-
- contributor
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:22 pm
Re: English, but where?
This doesn't necessarily mean that the mark is not for George Sharp. He was the companies silver foreman from 1852 to 1862. Before that, they used Taylor and Lawrie who had their own manufacturer's marks. According to Catherine Hollans 2013 book 'Philadelphia Silversmiths,' this mark was George Sharp's mark even if he only used it during his tenure at Bailey's.
Re: English, but where?
I had the same thought. But me for it's good to see the verified facts from contemporary publications.
Re: English, but where?
All fascinating, especially viewing the original source material (ads). Thanks to all for contributing to this lively discussion.
Re: English, but where?
I don't suppose anyone would ever look into this, but so far as I can tell J C Booth (James Curtis Booth) was not the Chief Assayer at the U S Mint in Philadelphia. He was a well respected chemist and the Melter and Refiner at the Philadelphia mint from 1849 until his death in 1888.silverly wrote:Found in Philadelphia and Its Manufactures, A Hand-book 1858.