Hello,
Could this be some sort of promotional/award item? The crest inside with the marks seems odd? The inside shows the wires(?) expanding from the center out. Other than the inside crest I cannot find any other marks, such as a date letter.
Many Thanks,
Tammy
[/img]
Elkington Mason & Co Publishers Bowl
Hi Trev,
Thanks for the reply; I have 2 questions, if I may. The inside of the bowl has wires that radiate out, is this a certain method of creating the bowl, excuse me if I sound uninformed, but I seem to have seen something on a site, some sort of soldering? Secondly, I have been on the silvercollection site to learn more about Elkington and still wonder if the marks in the crest relate to any hallmarks?
Thanks again,
Tammy
Thanks for the reply; I have 2 questions, if I may. The inside of the bowl has wires that radiate out, is this a certain method of creating the bowl, excuse me if I sound uninformed, but I seem to have seen something on a site, some sort of soldering? Secondly, I have been on the silvercollection site to learn more about Elkington and still wonder if the marks in the crest relate to any hallmarks?
Thanks again,
Tammy
I believe your piece is an example of the electroforming process. It was probably a replica made after a piece in a museum or private collection.
It is a silverplate piece, therefore the term "hallmarks" cannot apply to any marks on it. The crest is simply a part of the manufacturer's trademark.
Regards, Tom
It is a silverplate piece, therefore the term "hallmarks" cannot apply to any marks on it. The crest is simply a part of the manufacturer's trademark.
Regards, Tom
Hi,
I came across a reference that Henry Cole, the Director of the Department of Science and Art (now the Victoria and Albert Museum), gave in 1853, permission to Elkington to reproduce certain items in the national collection. These items were marked with an raised oval mark stating that the object was an approved copy of an original belonging to the Dept. of Science and Art, and was clearly marked as such and similar in many respects to the mark above. However, apparently it is known that Elkington also reproduced some pieces unofficially with their own mark.
Trev.
I came across a reference that Henry Cole, the Director of the Department of Science and Art (now the Victoria and Albert Museum), gave in 1853, permission to Elkington to reproduce certain items in the national collection. These items were marked with an raised oval mark stating that the object was an approved copy of an original belonging to the Dept. of Science and Art, and was clearly marked as such and similar in many respects to the mark above. However, apparently it is known that Elkington also reproduced some pieces unofficially with their own mark.
Looks like Tom was spot on.It was probably a replica made after a piece in a museum or private collection
Trev.
Hello,
Thank you for your detailed response, I have learned so much of history from all of the replies which led to discovering what the Great Exhibition of 1851 was all about, "the defining moment of the 19th Century"(Prince Albert), and who Sir Josiah Mason was. Thank you. I am a little confused about the electroforming/silverplating part-I am thinking the odd wires have something to do with replicating/copying the original?
Tam
Thank you for your detailed response, I have learned so much of history from all of the replies which led to discovering what the Great Exhibition of 1851 was all about, "the defining moment of the 19th Century"(Prince Albert), and who Sir Josiah Mason was. Thank you. I am a little confused about the electroforming/silverplating part-I am thinking the odd wires have something to do with replicating/copying the original?
Tam