help with this early continental salver - presume portuguese

PHOTOS REQUIRED - marks + item
Post Reply
rat-tail
contributor
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:32 am
Location: Durban, South Africa

help with this early continental salver - presume portuguese

Post by rat-tail »

Hi could anyone help me with this pretty little six inch salver with bead edge decoration on three delicate feet. Am I right to think the crowned L is for Lisbon, also got a Portuguese style assay squiggle on the back and a tiny little mark I can't make out with the naked eye, and which I've tried to photograph. There is a feint trace of a mark on the back, you'll see it as a slightly darker grey splodge south west of the assay squiggle, but it's unreadable. It looks like the makers mark (on the front) is J.J M. I would assume C1800s. Any help as to age, origin, and maker would be appreciated - thanks Frank

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
blakstone
contributor
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 3:05 am

Post by blakstone »

The form of the "L" is consistent with that used by Lisbon assayer Luis Gonzaga de Costa, working ca. 1790 - 1804, so I think your dating is spot-on. The maker JJ/M is recorded during the period but has not been conclusively identified; that said, he is probably José Jerónimo Marques who registered a different "JJM" mark in 1804.

Hope this helps!
rat-tail
contributor
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:32 am
Location: Durban, South Africa

Post by rat-tail »

Thanks Blakstone for sharing your knowledge. Appreciate it. Would you be able to tell if it's first or second standard silver. I assume that obscure little mark by the assay squiggle is the relevant one. It feels more like sterling but got the steely patina closer to old 800. But neither test is conclusive. Regards Frank
blakstone
contributor
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 3:05 am

Post by blakstone »

Well, the assayer’s mark guaranteed the minimum fineness of 9 dinheiros (9/12 = .750). 10 dinheiros (.833) and 11 dinheiros (.916) were also permitted, and were generally marked with the appropriate Roman numeral: X or XI, with the latter by far the more common of the two.

So I don’t think the tiny mark is a fineness mark. I can’t make anything out of it; are you sure it’s really a mark?
dognose
Site Admin
Posts: 62892
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: England

Post by dognose »

Frank, a clearer photo of the mark would be of assistance.
rat-tail
contributor
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:32 am
Location: Durban, South Africa

Post by rat-tail »

Hi guys - will try to get a clearer shot on Sunday - sorry two double shifts ahead of me to get the weekend newspapers out here. The little mark could simply be a tool mark, maybe where this was held on some sort of lathe or something - it's pretty much in the centre - yes and sorry this lovely piece could do with a quick whiff of polish. Thanks frank
Post Reply

Return to “Other Countries”