Paul Sandig vs. Hugo Sandig

Do not post mark questions here.
Post Reply
vonpfrentsch
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:29 pm

Paul Sandig vs. Hugo Sandig

Post by vonpfrentsch »

In the database it reads "Hugo Sandig" for the mark "HS/SH" (and it is meanwhile widely quoted in Germany, e.g. in eBay).
The company has been found by Hugo, but the mark -we talk here about the 20th century!- the database refers to is the mark of the company called Paul Sandig, Liegnitz/Silesia, as I can prove with the original catalogue.
dognose
Site Admin
Posts: 62330
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: England

Re: Paul Sandig vs. Hugo Sandig

Post by dognose »

Hi,

Welcome to the Forum.

If you can post some images from that catalogue, I'm sure we'll all be very interested to see them.

Trev.
Bahner
contributor
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:34 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Paul Sandig vs. Hugo Sandig

Post by Bahner »

Hi, Hugo (1836-1895) had founded the company in Breslau and moved it to Liegnitz around 1869. His son Paul (1864-1940) joined the company in 1894. In 1904 the company was renamed "Liegnitzer Silberwarenfabrik Paul Sandig and Co." (the "and Co." being a certain Richard O'Brian, Paul's brother-in-law). It remained active until the end of the Second World War. After 1947 the premises were taken over by the Polish company Hefra (Henneberg-Fraget). which continues to produce silverplated cutlery until this very day, partly using the old Sandig machinery. Best wishes, Bahner
Bahner
contributor
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:34 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Paul Sandig vs. Hugo Sandig

Post by Bahner »

Guess I should have added that it was not uncommon to use a maker's mark for generations, regardless of the name of the owners. B.
Post Reply

Return to “General Questions”