London Date Letter For 1866

PHOTOS REQUIRED - marks + item
Post Reply
Traintime
contributor
Posts: 2952
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:44 pm

London Date Letter For 1866

Post by Traintime »

Looking at the various date letter charts, they seem to be very accurate in minor details. However, here is a second example of Henry John Lias & Son (see prior goblet) having a small "l" with a slight added difference to the back left side half-way down. Such is noted on the small "l" in the Birmingham chart, but not for London. [I'm not referencing the cartouche shape, but the lett itself.] Were there mark variations at the assay office, or could this relate to an interim change of masters requiring another letter style?

Salt spoon sample:

Image

Image

Image
Traintime
contributor
Posts: 2952
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:44 pm

Re: London Date Letter For 1866

Post by Traintime »

Much better letter details are here: https://www.silvermakersmarks.co.uk/Dat ... s%20L.html
silvermakersmarks
co-admin
Posts: 1827
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:22 am
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Contact:

Re: London Date Letter For 1866

Post by silvermakersmarks »

Hallmark charts can only ever be approximations to the real world. There would have been a number of date letter punches in use during an assay year with different sizes needed depending on the item being assayed. In addition some would have had to be replaced during the year because of wear and tear. All of these punches were made by hand with (probably) minor variations from one to another. Also there were special sets of punches for particular items such as watch cases.

Assay office wardens held office for one year and the date letter changed at the end of their term so there would not have been the need to change a letter style for this reason during the assay year.

Phil
Traintime
contributor
Posts: 2952
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:44 pm

Re: London Date Letter For 1866

Post by Traintime »

Thank you, Phil.
Post Reply

Return to “London Hallmarks”