I have had this box for many years and I would like to be sure of its originality
![Image](https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2020/46/1/1604935420-20201108-132942.jpg)
![Image](https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2020/46/1/1604935420-20201108-132954.jpg)
![Image](https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2020/46/1/1604935420-20201108-133011.jpg)
![Image](https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2020/46/1/1604935420-20201108-133033.jpg)
![Image](https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2020/46/1/1604935420-20201108-133049.jpg)
See it this way: Since there is a fineness mark (84) it must have been assayed. The fineness mark is punched by the assayer in the assaying office. In addition, when it has a fineness punch, must the mark AK be the assayer and not the maker. Moreover, according to the Russian law, the assayer was prohibited to punch his mark unless the maker's mark was not already punched. Therefore the AK is the assayer not the maker. Since there is no maker's mark only the assayer's mark, the object is imported. Is the assayer Kovalsky or Kudrin, I don't know because the town mark is a mess.Qrt.S wrote: Since the box lacks the maker's mark but is assayed it indicates that it is imported.